Thursday, October 08, 2009

Radio baseball

Chris Berman, calling Phillies-Rockies for ESPN radio, is a more accurate & detailed describer of action than the Yankees' John Sterling. Sterling uses broad strokes & sometimes you don't know where a fly ball has been hit until it's caught, falls in, or lands in the seats. Sterling's strength is in situations & conjecture, what he thinks might or ought to happen next, which is alright because he has a long, familiar relationship with listeners. Berman tells you which direction an outfielder is moving to reach a hit ball, you get a picture. Berman's analyst sidekick, Rick Sutcliffe. mostly sounds like he's reading from a stack of cards scripted by committee before the game. Suzyn Waldman, with the Yankees, sounds like she's struggling to decipher her own scratch notes until she gives up & wings it.

I'm a fan of radio baseball because it's radio, & has a long tradition of individuality in announcing styles. & it can play in the background. But TV baseball also has too many graphics, too much emphasis on useless & confusing computer-generated statistics, too many cutaways from field action, & too much redundant chatter. TV baseball has lost its sense of pacing, of ebb & flow, the uneventful innings, the slow build up of what become scoring threats. Radio baseball is allowed to be dull when it is dull.

Labels: , ,


Comments:
I brought my old school 9 volt battery operated AM radio to work today so I could listen to Doyers game, which started at 3:07 p.m. PST. I spent more than 30 years listening to baseball more than watching it on TV or live. I echo Bob's sentiments. Which is why I brought the damn AM radio to work (laughs)!
 
Gutsy Dodgers win on Thursday. Two runs scratched in with two outs & nobody on base. That's great baseball.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." Thomas Jefferson

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?